Some accomplishment (Day 149/365)

Okay, so it wasn’t orchestrating Make Way, but at least I got something done.

I wrote an article to publicize the First Look on January 10. I emailed members of our little octet to see if they would like to meet more than once, as per Marc’s suggestion that we need as much practice as we can get.

And I put together a Keynote presentation of the poetry of William Blake’s Inn, with the music embedded in it. Keynote is Apple’s version of M****’s P****P**nt, only prettier. Of course.

Since the William Blake playlist (via iTunes) starts playing as soon as the presentation does, I’m going to whip up some little nothing to cover the title and Prologue pages. At some point. Between now and Jan. 9. Maybe tomorrow?

Almost nothing (Day 148/365)

I was determined to get something done today. I even got out the mug I made at GHP nearly twenty years ago, my “get in the composing/translating/writing mode” mug. However, this talisman failed. I just didn’t get anything done.

Part of the reason was that I started the day with a long massage from my former massage therapist James Leipold. The man is a genius, and when he left Newnan last year to attend chiropractic school, I was bereft. When he called and said he was in town, I jumped at the chance, especially since my left arm had been keeping me awake with its tendonitis. So that was way worth it, but it knocked out the entire morning.

I did force myself to sing through William Blake, the first time I’d done that in a long time, and maybe the first time I’d done it paying strict attention to the bass line. Hmm, a couple of lines that got my attention for sure. Not badly written, but oddly placed for a bass line and hard to hear. The one at the end of “Tale of the Tailor” in particular is going to be tricky: above the tenor’s melody and then dreadfully modal on top of that, the kind of thing that would take a good five minutes of Masterworks practice just to nail down those intervals. (And then it still wouldn’t be right…) I also found a misprint in the vocal score.

I walked to the post office to mail some back issues of Dramatist’s magazine to Mike Funt. (If he’d join Dramatist’s Guild like he needs to…) I also bought stamps to mail First Look postcards.

I read Nancy Willard’s essays on writing in A Nancy Willard Reader, including one where she keeps a diary on where the time goes when she’s writing or trying to write. Picked up a great Rilke quote: “If the angel deigns to come, it will be because you have convinced him, not by tears, but by your horrible resolve to be a beginner.”

I communicated with the Lacuna/Mame gang. I opened a WriteRoom file to write the First Look article and even typed in “article to promote First Look” in it before walking away.

Otherwise, nada.

However, it occurs to me that I need to talk about last night’s performace of the Cirque du Soleil. It was as usual breathtaking in its beauty. Isn’t that an odd thing to say about a circus? But that’s the thing that strikes me about the Cirque shows: they are deliberately beautiful. The first time I saw a Cirque performance live, the overwhelming impression I had was, “So this is what it’s like to be creative when there are no limits.” It occured to me then how much my own creativity had been limited by money and resources. This is not to say that I’m capable of the kinds of design you see in Cirque, but certainly over the twenty-something years I designed for NCTC, it was a constant thought in my head: do I have the money to make this, and do I have someone who can build it?

Usually the answer was no, and over the years you develop your own restrictions. You fail to dare to dream. Sometimes the limitations could be inspiring, like the set design for 1997’s Midsummer: we had about $100 in the bank, and everything in the set was what I could find upstairs. But more often, you just stop thinking outside the box.

An aside: when NCTC first moved into the Johnson Hardware building, the first set I designed was Streetcar. I found that I didn’t know where to begin, because for thirteen years I had started every set design for the Manget-Brannon space by sketching in those damned poles: thirteen foot squares defined by nine-inch beams. Did I hide them? Incorporate them? Try to ignore them? When we hit the new space, with an actual 26-foot proscenium, I had nothing to anchor the design. I was lost. You assimilate your limits.

Every three or four years, I’d go for what I called “one of Dale’s shows,” where I just let loose and went as far as I could in every direction: Heartbreak House, The Illusion, Pericles, The Winter’s Tale, Mozart’s Marriage of Figaro. I’d push the boundaries of what everyone around me thought was possible, and I think everyone benefitted from it. But it was always a huge trek from beginning to end. There wouldn’t be anyone else around me who “got it,” which meant that the source of the vision had to come from me. Everyone was willing to do what I told them, but I had to tell them. (Not absolutely true, of course: Marc in Illusion and Pericles; Becky Clark with the Winter’s Tale costumes; Dave Dorrell with the Figaro set.)

So it is my deepest hope that with the Lacuna/William Blake experience, we’ll be able to move forward together and have multiple sources of vision.

Back to Cirque and the ideas I stole. The show, Corteo, was, as I’ve said repeatedly, a model for William Blake. Ostensibly a funeral (albeit one in which the honoree was the main character), that idea only popped up now and then, and if there was a plot, I failed to discern it. But things kept moving, of course, and the design was impeccable. Fellini appeared to be a major influence, from the first somber cortege that dissolved into random and surreal “events.” Characters were introduced who ran throughout the piece, sometimes literally. Angels flew in and out. The cortege kept reforming and dissolving. And always, of course, the actual circus acts with their dazzling performers, physically beautiful and athletically astounding.

So I got ideas for angel wings, stage groupings, group movements, choreography. And I’m not giving up on flying people yet.

Prep work (Day 147/365)

Today I designed a postcard invitation for the First Look at William Blake on Jan. 10. I also snagged a second tenor for the octet singing the work.

I’m beginning a discussion with myself about advertising the First Look before the fact, in effect inviting the public. On my official invite list are members of Lacuna, members of Masterworks, friends and relatives, and others who mght have something to do with the eventual production. But how many of those can/will show up, I have no idea. I would hate to have fewer people in the audience than are singing!

Is it sensible to invite the public? Might we not get some interested/talented folk who would be good to have on board? Input is welcome.

More Make Way (Day 145/365)

Despite its being Christmas Eve, I have forced myself to tackle the next bit of Make Way. I had orchestrated the Rabbit’s entrance in a very restrained manner, and today I looked at the next twenty measures or so, moving through the Wise Cow’s reply to the opening of her waltz.

On the whole, I think it’s not even there yet. I was working in SoftSynth mode to save memory, but when I tried it in Garritan Personal Orchestra, it sounded so different that I think I will have to continue in memory-suck mode.

My mind’s not really tuned into it, of course, so I’m not sure whether what I hacked out today is going to stand. It’s not very subtle. What I may need to do is go straight to the last stanzas and orchestrate the big finish, then back up from there.

I may also try backing off some of the orchestra and letting the piano handle some of the chordal accompaniment for the first stanzas. It’s what I’m used to hearing anyway…

This is proving an interesting challenge, because this piece was one I sketched out many years ago but didn’t actually write until we returned from Scotland, i.e., 2003, and as such is representative of my “mature” style, just more solid in structure and development. I like it a lot; I think it’s quite a nice piece, and making the transfer from piano score to orchestra is difficult. Like Milky Way, it has got to sound exactly “right” to fulfill its promise. And at the moment I’m not sure I’m getting it exactly right.

That’s the joy of using the computer, though: it can be wrong again and again, and I can just switch instruments until finally it is exactly right. Whether I achieve that by January 9/10 is another question.

Make way! (Day 141/365)

I didn’t think I’d get anything done today, but tonight I started on the orchestration for Make Way. I figured that of my three choices it needed the most attention. Both Marmalade Man and Tale of the Tailor sound halfway orchestrated in the playback of the piano score, so if I went ahead and tackled Make Way, then everything would sound as if I had some orchestral inkling come January 10.

Speaking of which, Marc has taken the bull by the horns and started discussion of the music and the piece as a whole over on the Lacuna blog. I don’t know that we’ll get anyone talking on the site again, yet, but it’s worth a shot.

Anyway, I got twelve measures done, which is not as much work as it might sound. The cello part was obvious, of course, but then the rest of the accompaniment? Strings in the chords? Double the melody? Where? Flute’s too low; have I overused the clarinet? Oboe’s too strident, even for the Rabbit, at least in the opening.

What I’ve ended up with is simplicity itself: the lilting downbeat quarter notes in the cello; melody in the flute and clarinet; and only the bassline of the chordal accompaniment, in the bassoon. Very spare, and I arrived at it only after putting the chordal accompaniment everywhere I could think of: low strings, oboe, horns, harp. All of it was too much, and now I’m opening what will be the most glorious waltz in the piece with a very, very restrained ensemble. Perfect.

An opening (Day 135/365)

Some days it’s easy. Today, for example, I was creative before I even woke up, hence the early post.

I’ve carrying around in my head for a couple of days some musical ideas for the prologue. In Lacuna, we’ve discussed several ideas for staging, and the one that keeps popping up in my head is the one where we open in a dreary, earthbound inn, where children are stuck with nothing to do and all their elders repress them.

So, from the darkness, we hear a double-bass, rasping out a long, slow note. That note grows stronger and more toned, then the bass slides into a slow version of the Inn theme. Low strings join it in desperate arpeggiation, but the theme goes nowhere, until it bursts into one of those minor (dim.?) orchestral stingers. Lights up on the Dreary Inn, dull and gray and isolated down right.

Old codger reading aloud, unintelligibly [yes, Marc, he can read from Blake]. Two ladies taking tea, murmuring with pinched noses. Three children, fidgety, shushed by the ladies and the codger.

Disreputable looking handyman, in whiskers and a smock, shuffles through. Surreptitiously hands the children an engraving of … something the audience can see, the Wise Cow or the King of Cats… “Watch,” he tells the children, and as he shuffles off, the engraving vanishes in flame.

He returns and gives one child a music box. “Listen,” he says, and the child opens it. It plays the Inn theme, and the child is shushed. The old codger goes to the harmonium and begins playing “Jerusalem,” badly. The handyman comes in and stops him, with an “Out of Order” sign, indicating he needs to repair it. He plays a couple of bars of “Blake Calls for Fire.” The lighting struggles to change, as probably it does each time Blake’s magic threatens reality.

The handyman turns his back to us, and when he turns around, he sheds his whiskers and smock and is revealed as William Blake. “Believe,” he says to the children. He spreads his wings (!) and soars into the space center stage. He beckons the children as “William Blake’s Inn” begins, more eerie than I’ve got it scored at the moment.

At “Two mighty dragons brew and bake,” the couch where the two ladies are sitting turn into the dragons. The ladies themselves sprout wings and become the “two patient angels.” The feathers from their shaken linens bloom into the snowstorm. Other children can be dimly seen playing in the snow. The Inn pulsates with light here and there.

And then it all fades. Blake soars away and vanishes. The dragons turn back into the couch, the wingless ladies take their tea, and the old codger finishes wheezing out the last two bars of Jerusalem on the harmonium, now without its “Out of Order” sign.

The children are left to find their way to the Inn, now the only reality they want to see.

Slouching towards… (Day 134/365)

Today I burned copies of the CD for the seven members of the Jan. 10 ensemble, made labels for them, printed complete piano/vocal scores for them, wrote a letter of introduction/instruction, collated everything, and got them ready to go out the door.

So far, we have Anne Tarbutton, Denise Meacham, Mary Frances Glover, Ginny Lyles, Matthew Bailey, Marc Honea, and me. I’d like to have one more tenor just for balance.

Next, a guest list (other than Lacuna) for the evening.

More tidying (Day 132/365)

Today I went through the whole score and double-checked the lyrics against Nancy Willard’s poetry. It is astonishing the number of discrepancies I found. You would think that after twenty years of working on this I would have the woman’s work memorized. You would be wrong.

Nothing egregious, mind you, but enough slips to make me go through all fifteen pieces with a fine tooth comb. They are all now corrected and ready to print out for a piano-vocal score for the small chorus to sing on January 10.

Musings (Day 131/365)

Minimal activity today: after I printed out the orchestral score of Milky Way on Friday, I noticed that the title was wrong. Since I had used Sun and Moon Circus as the template for my orchestrations, Milky Way still had that title, both on the first page and as headers subsequently. So today I’ve gone through to doublecheck all those files so that an incorrect title won’t be a reason for me to have to print out a score again. Didn’t take long, which leaves me time to consider other items.

For example, I’m thinking the tabloid paper (11×17) I used is not going to be big enough for a conductor’s score. The notes were tiny. However, the tabloid setting is the largest that Finale seems to handle. I guess. I haven’t installed the 2007 version yet. I have trepidations.

The good news is that last night I got an e-newsletter from Gary Garritan, he of the Garritan Personal Orchestra sounds that have been giving me such trouble computer-memory-speaking-wise. He was letting us know that the German company who makes the Kontakt Player has updated that program to work with the new Intel Macs, and that he would have his stuff re-coded by the beginning of the year. This is a Huzzah, folks, because it removes any qualms I had about sinking huge dollar amounts into a new laptop. We’ll see what Apple announces in January.

Since we’re beginning to move forward in a definite way on William Blake, the need for the new laptop becomes real: I need reliable sound-making for demos and for rehearsal CDs and such. Also, orchestrating the remaining big pieces won’t be such a big hairy deal.

However, I also am going to need a big ol’ laser printer at some point to print the conductor’s score. Those are even more expensive than the laptop, and I cannot justify that expenditure at all.

In other news, I have watched two videos in the last week or so that have really inspired me. One was Uncommon Sense: the art and imagination of Nancy Willard, a short 2003 documentary of Nancy Willard’s artwork. She does these beautiful, unsettling assemblages, the people and creatures which inhabit her writing. (Yes, she has the Inn, and I’m thinking we need an exhibit of her work to accompany the premiere.)

The other video is on a DVD which includes Powers of Ten, a film by Charles & Ray Eames, the husband and wife design team. The other film on the DVD is 901: after 45 years of working. Made by the couple’s grandson, it’s a tour of the studio at 901 Washington Boulevard in Venice, California, which Ray had decided should be shut down and dispersed in the event of her death. Before this happened, the filmmaker documented the space and the materials and the work.

Both videos show what truly creative people can do given the necessary freedom. Willard does hers on a small, personal scale, while the Eames’s work was international in its scope and impact, but both involve the assemblage of disparate elements in often surreal but always striking ways.

It occurred to me that this is the environment we need to establish to work on William Blake: a studio of resources, both personal and material, that will feed the creative energies of the company. Easier said than done, of course. Both Willard and the Eames maintain huge stockpiles of stuff, the raw materials of their dreams. We have no place for that. Any storyboarding/flowcharting we do has to be stowed before we leave and put back up the next time we work. That’s going to hamper us in small but definite ways.
What we need is a storefront somewhere we can use for the next year or so to get this thing ready. Yep, that’s what we need all right.

Triumph! (Day 127/365)

Done, for a ducat!

The orchestration of 10. Blake Leads a Walk on the Milky Way is done. Or at least the first draft is done. There are still a couple of measures that I’m sure I will revisit, but for now, it’s finished.

Here is the mp3 of the completed orchestration.

So, what next? Here are our choices:

  • 5. The Man in the Marmalade Hat Arrives (mp3)
  • 9. The Wise Cow Makes Way, Room, and Believe (mp3)
  • 15. Blake Tells the Tiger the Tale of the Tailor (mp3)

I rather think I’ll leave Marmalade Man till last, since it’s already mostly orchestrated. What does everyone else think?