Some more thank you’s

This time I need to thank all my fellow media specialists here in Coweta County who sent me biographies of Frederick Douglass to look over. At this point, of course, most of them are not even close to being readable by third graders.

The best so far is A picture book of Frederick Douglass, by David A. Adler (Holiday House), but even so it omits some key elements of Douglass’s life that we would need to have included. I’m waiting for one final biography that I ordered online that claims to have a reading level of 2nd-3rd grade. We’ll see.

I’m also obliged to Loren Hawkins, my 3rd grade partner in crime, for loaning me basal readers and the accompanying workbooks. I want to get some clearer idea, having been a high school English teacher in my dark past, of what would be needed in a three-week period in a 3rd grade language arts scenario.

Besides the obvious reasons for doing so (e.g., I have no clear picture of elementary language arts, never having taught it), we need to make sure that what we’re proposing isa), not so different that it would scare teachers who are more comfortable with their worksheets, and b), would cover the same necessary skills, albeit in a more integrated manner than is currently the case.

A couple of thank you’s

First, I’d like to thank Loren Hawkins, intrepid 3rd grade teacher here at Newnan Crossing Elementary, for agreeing to work with me on this Frederick Douglass unit. As I confessed to her, I don’t think the concept of using social studies readings instead of a worksheet-oriented basal reader is going to get us anywhere, but at least we will have an example of the way learning could be if anyone had the guts to make the significant changes called for by the new GPS curriculum. It can stand as a shining reproach to us all.

Second, thanks to Alison Zimbalist at the New York Times for providing a permanent link to the article “In Africa, free schools feed a different hunger,” by Celia W. Dugger. Check it out!

Loren and I will be working together to put together an instructional unit for the new 3rd grade social studies curriculum which will also cover the language arts standards. It will have media skills embedded, naturally, as well as all the vocabulary/writing/reading skills usually encountered. It will have explicit metacognitive reading skills instruction to use with the NYT article: how do you tackle something like that and make sure you understand it? It will have quizzes, performance tasks, rubrics, differentiation, and all that jazz.

As Hemingway says at the end of The Sun Also Rises, “Isn’t it pretty to think so?” Maybe that should be a new CLF mug.

UBD, part 2

Deeper and deeper: I’m filling out all kinds of forms, floundering through the Understanding by Design process, trying to remain open to what it can tell me about instructional design.

It’s similar in a way to composing, just hammering out a melody or harmony, trying to figure out what’s supposed to come next. Or, as Heidi Hayes Jacobs says, it’s creative writing, and like a novelist or short story writer, we don’t always know what comes next.

However, it’s not a comfortable feeling, is it? We know exactly what we’re supposed to be doing and how it’s spozed to be.

One source of my discomfort is the fact that we do have so many standards to embed in the unit, and UBD isn’t really structured for that. I find myself focusing on the two or three that admit of the most “uncoverage,” and not really thinking about all the other social studies standards that are part of the original thought, and certainly not of the language arts standards that I’m fairly sure we can cover in this unit without recourse to a language arts textbook.

I’ve invited the third grade teachers to join me in working on this, but at this point no one has responded to my invitation to cooperate.

So what have I accomplished so far?

Students will know details of Douglass’s life; vocabulary dealing with U.S. history of the period, the character traits, and vocabulary generated from the reading selections (especially the NYT article); factual information about slavery.

Students will be able to compare obstacles in Douglass’s life to those in their own; reflect on the role of literacy in Douglass’s life, in Africa today (from the NYT article), and in their own lives; generate and answer questions about Douglass, slavery, and the Underground Railroad.

Students will understand how Douglass expanded rights and freedoms of all Americans through his personal triumph over social barriers; that slavery was an economic, social, and moral system that had negative impact on all members of society.

At this point, I’m thinking that my two previously proposed essential questions (What was the greatest obstacle Douglass had to overcome? and What in his life most helped him overcome that obstacle?) are still good for this unit.

For a culminating performance task, here’s what I’m thinking at the moment: The student will create a museum exhibit which explains to visitors the student’s response to the essential questions. This could be done in teams, of course.

Understanding by Design

I have started trying to get all my Frederick Douglass ducks in a row by using the Understanding by Design “backwards design” process. I am using both the original book, by Wiggins & McTighe, and the accompanying UBD: Professional Development Workbook, by the same team.

It’s a long and complex process. I feel like I did back in my first classes in instructional design, when you had to go through the entire process step by step, and show your work on every page. I think it’s probably vital to do this, so that I can assimilate the process to the point that I can assist teachers when they begin having to think in the same terms.

I think that if I had not been working with these concepts for the past thirteen years, with the same names, Wiggins, McTighe, Marzano, Jacobs, Silver, Strong, then as now, I’d be very hard put to get this under my belt. I think what we as a community of educators in the state of Georgia are facing is a very tough adoption of a very tough innovation, and that unless the PTB have planned more and better training than I have yet to see evidence of, this innovation will fail. Support, support, and continuous support, or performance standards will not be accepted in any meaningful way by most teachers in this state.

A short digression to illustrate my point: As I work on integrating the social studies and language arts performance standards in my Douglass unit, I keep facing the fact that we have to come up with a great deal of basal-reader-style skill activities to go with our new reading selections. Not that it can’t be done, of course, but we’re used to workbooks already done for us. Here’s my illustration: given our reading curriculum now, i.e., weekly selection, worksheet, worksheet, worksheet, test, how do we expect instruction to change to support the revised GPS curriculum? To put it another way, what makes us think most teachers are going to alter their instruction in response to the new standards? Even more pointedly, what in our LEA makes us think that they are going to be encouraged to do so?

Back to my main point, or rather, my main puzzlement with the Understanding by Design process. It seems to me as I work through filling out the forms that most of this design process seems geared to designing instruction based on a single objective/standard, whereas we’ve already seen that we have a passel of performance standards to attach to this unit. Do we focus on a couple of main ones (which is what I’m doing at the moment), or do we attempt to go full-bore with all of them?

An immodest proposal

Here’s a thought: what if we ditched our “language arts” textbook entirely and implemented our language arts performance standards through readings in our social studies and science curricula?

I’m going to use our Frederick Douglass example, with the essential question, What was the biggest obstacle Douglass had to overcome, and what in his life most helped him overcome it?

What if we had:

  • a brief biography of Douglass
  • Pink and Say, by Polacco
  • Sweet Clara and the Freedom Quilt, by Hopkinson
  • Follow the Drinking Gourd, by Winter
  • a recent in-depth article on the impact of free schools in Africa from the New York Times [Pushed by world monetary forces, African governments are lifting school fees, which though low are still prohibitive for most citizens. The result is first-grade classes with 150 kids in them as children flock for the opportunity to learn to read and write.]
  • perhaps an excerpt from Booker T. Washington’s autobiography in which he describes the day freedom was proclaimed on his plantation, when he was six years old.

But that’s too much to read! We’d never get through it!

We would if we didn’t have “weekly selections” and all those worksheets to do. Those would be our reading selections. We’d use our brief bio as the main selection, then branch off from there.

Go look at the third grade GPS language arts curriculum. Can we not cover (and by “we,” I mean classroom teachers, of course) almost all of these standards by reading the above items? And what we don’t cover with Douglass, we can cover with Revere, Anthony, Bethune, the Roosevelts, and Chavez. Or with materials for our science studies.

And we can also cover our social studies standards at the same time, using our readings as the basis for further research into Douglass’ life and times as we try to answer the essential questions.

Is part of the answer to our overall question of what media’s role is in all this, is that we can provide this kind of thinking/design/implementation in collaboration with teachers?

Here’s an idea…

RE: thinking outside the box… Artist Chris Cobb talked Adobe Bookshop in San Francisco (naturally) into allowing him to reclassify their 20,000 books by color, for one week. So the next time a kid comes in asked, “You know that green book I had last week?”, you’ll have a mental image of where to look. Some amazing pictures here, and an interview here.

This has nothing to do with curriculum, but it was too wonderfully strange not too share. It’s stuff librarians’ dreams/nightmares are made of.

Starting small… backwards

One phrase you’ll hear in the training for the new GPS curriculum is backwards design, i.e., begin with what you want to end up with and then plan backwards from there to your activities.

This idea has been around for a long time, and we’ve even been using it in Coweta County to some extent in the form of “essential questions.” An essential question, if designed properly, provides a focus for a unit that prevents us from throwing any old kind of activity into the unit, even a good one if it doesn’t help answer the question; and it aims kids’ attention to the most important ideas of the unit.

Here’s a suggestion for an essential question for our study of Frederick Douglass: What was the biggest obstacle Frederick Douglass had to overcome, and what in his life most helped him overcome it?

This essential question doesn’t have to cover all the standards, but it should help us get to most of them.

Any ideas as to how this would play out in the classroom? in the media center?

A thought re: taxon vs. locale memory

Here’s a thought I had while writing about taxon and locale memory but didn’t include: the popular computer game The Sims is nothing more than humans without locale memory. You have to teach them everything, and the only way they can learn it is through constant repetition. Even the worst blockhead who ever walked through the doors of the media center doesn’t have to be shown the way out, but that’s the way we’d be without locale memory.

And we want to teach using taxon memory? What is wrong with us?

Start small

I did a complete grid with all our suspects (Revere through Chavez), along with all the standards and bits and pieces, and that was overwhelming, so I’m going to start out by focusing on just one of these people and see where it gets me.

I’ll start with Frederick Douglass.

So, for Douglass, we have to

  • discuss his life, examining (I suppose) how he expanded people’s rights and freedoms in our democracy [SS3H2.a]
  • explain social barriers, restrictions, and obstacles he had to overcome, and how he overcame them [SS3H2.b]
  • identify locations significant to his life and times, on a political map [SS3G2.a]
  • describe how place (physical and human characteristics) impacted his life [SS3G2.b]
  • describe how he adapted to and was influenced by his environment [SS3G2.c]
  • traces examples of his travel, and his ideas across time [SS3G2.d]
  • describe how the region in which he lived affected his life and impacted his cultural identification [SS3G2.e]
  • describe how he displayed positive character traits: cooperation, diligence, liberty, justice, tolerance, freedom of conscience and expression, and respect for and acceptance of authority [SS3CG2]

Easier to handle? Perhaps.

So how would the media center fit into a curriculum that asks third grade students to accomplish the above?

Definition by example

One of the classic writing strategies I’m sure we’re teaching the kids is definition by example. Even if you can’t define a concept in so many words, you can always give examples of the concept, and that way your reader gets the idea.

I think we can tackle our problem at hand (What is the role of the media center/specialist in the GPS curriculum?) in a kind of reverse order definition by example, an inductive reasoning process where we go from a particular performance standard to a set of generalized principles which we can apply to the entire curriculum.

Where to begin? Let’s take the 3rd grade social studies standards, a small cluster of them. If you don’t already have your own copy, download it at http://www.georgiastandards.org/socialstudies.asp. (In checking the link just now, I find that there’s now a side-by-side comparison of the social studies QCCs and GPSs, but soc studs are the only ones to have that at the moment. Good work, DOE!)

Here’s the second of the history standards (the first is the infamous ancient Greece one, not as bad as everyone fears):

SS3H2 The student will discuss the lives of Americans who expanded people’s rights and freedoms in a democracy.

a. Paul Revere (independence), Frederick Douglass (civil rights), Susan B. Anthony (women’s rights), Mary McLeod Bethune (education), Franklin D. Roosevelt (New Deal & World War II), Eleanor Roosevelt (United Nations & human rights),Thurgood Marshall (civil rights), Lyndon B. Johnson (Great Society & voting rights), and Cesar Chavez (worker’s rights)
b. explain social barriers, restrictions, and obstacles that thes overcome [sic], and describe how they overcame them

Here’s a geography standard:

SS3G2 The student will describe the cultural and geographic systems associated with the historical figures in SS3H2a.

a. identify specific locations significant to the life and times of these historic figures on a political map
b. describe how place (physical and human characteristics) impacted the lives of these historic figures
c. describe how each of these historic figures adapted to and was influenced by their environment
d. trace examples of travel and movement of these historic figures and their ideas across time
e. describe how the region in which these historic figures lived affected their lives and impacted their cultural identification

Here’s a civics/government standard:

SS3CG2 The student will describe how these historic figures display positive character traits of cooperation, diligence, liberty, justice, tolerance, freedom of conscience and expression, and respect for and acceptance of authority.

Leaving aside for the moment how we’re going to demonstrate respect for and acceptance of authority with the lives of Susan B. Anthony, Eleanor Roosevelt and César Chavez, let’s talk about what the media center could do for a third grade team that is facing this new set of standards.

Ideas, anyone?